.
Feedback

'Psycho' Writer's Widow: 'Hitchcock' Full of Lies and Mistakes

Marilyn Stefano, widow of screenwriter Joseph Stefano, takes action against the portrayal of her husband and his work in the film "Hitchcock."

LOS ANGELES, CA -- Psycho screenwriter Joseph Stefano's widow and son are in settlement talks with Fox Searchlight Pictures over the depiction of Stefano in the current film Hitchcock, which they claim wrongly credits Alfred Hitchcock's wife with Stefano's ideas and work on the classic thriller.

Marilyn and Dominic Stefano of Agoura Hills have hired legal counsel to represent Joseph Stefano’s estate in seeking compensation from the studio.

“Fox Searchlight’s actions … have caused, and will continue to cause, financial damages to our client and to his intellectual property interests and injury to our client’s legacy in connection with Psycho,” attorney William Sobel wrote in a letter to the studio in October.

Negotiations between lawyers for Stefano’s estate and the studio are ongoing. Sobel and Fox Searchlight spokeswoman Lauren Hochberg declined to comment on the status of the talks.

Hitchcock, now in theaters, is about the relationship between the legendary filmmaker, played by Anthony Hopkins, and his wife, Alma Reville, played by Helen Mirren, during the filming of Psycho.

In the official trailer, Hitchcock asks Reville if she is intrigued by the idea of having the heroine killed halfway through the movie. “You shouldn’t wait until halfway through; kill her off after 30 minutes,” Mirren’s character replies. (Go to 1:33 in the attached video.)

That scene in particular angered Marilyn Stefano, and it is cited by her attorney in his letter to the studio.

“In fact, it is well-documented in numerous publications that our client [Joseph Stefano] conceived the … idea, and the film falsely attributes our client’s work product and ingenuity to Mr. Hitchcock’s wife,” Sobel wrote.

Marilyn Stefano, who was on the set for the shooting of Psycho’s infamous shower scene, said she was "appalled" by Hitchcock and its “lies” and “mistakes” in the depiction of her husband, of the famed director and others who were involved in making the film, which was released in 1960.

"How on earth did Sacha Gervasi get to direct this film?" Marilyn said. "So many mistakes, errors, changes of facts and lies."

Hochberg said Gervasi was traveling and unavailable to comment.

Joseph Stefano adapted the Psycho screenplay from the novel by Robert Bloch. He also went on to produce and write episodes of the television series The Outer Limits, Psycho IV: The Beginning and other films and TV shows. He died in 2006 at the age of 84.

Credit Where It's Not Due

The movie's depiction of Joseph Stefano and its portrayal of Reville suggesting that the Marion Crane character, played by Janet Leigh, be killed early in the film, has so angered Marilyn that she wrote her criticisms in a letter to Agoura Hills Patch.

“The script written by my husband was what turned an ugly, trashy little book into a movie watched and studied by every film class in the world, I dare say,” Marilyn wrote. “But to claim that Alma revised it, and came up with the idea of killing the heroine off within the first 30 minutes, is such an outrageous lie that it infuriates me. It's taking credit from the real writer, whose dialogue is printed and quoted by so many, without crediting anyone but the great Hitchcock—and now the great Alma Reville.”

“Shortly after Joe and Hitch meet [in the movie],” Marilyn wrote, “Hitch tells Alma he had Stefano write out the first few scenes, asks her to read them and she tells him—“Hire him.” … There’s no way Joe would have started writing any of the script without first being hired—which he was at the end of that first meeting—he would have gotten in trouble with the Writers Guild that doesn’t allow auditioning.

“They have a scene where Peggy, Hitch’s assistant, actually says that the credit should be: Written by Joseph Stefano and Alma Reville! (Alma says: “The people who matter know. That’s all that counts.”)  Strangely, this little scene is not in the script the studio sends out for writing nomination. Did they ad-lib it?”

The Opening Scene

Marilyn told Patch in a previous interview that her husband had his famous first meeting with Hitchcock in 1959, shortly after reading Bloch’s book, which only introduces Marion Crane as she's checking into the infamous Bates Motel.

"He was on his way to the meeting at Paramount when he wrote the whole opening scene to the movie in his head," Marilyn said. “Joe wanted to develop more of a back-story for the character, so when she dies the audience misses her.”

Hitchcock was so impressed that Joseph got the job on the spot, she said.

More Criticisms

Marilyn had other criticisms of the film:

Joseph, played by Ralph Macchio, is portrayed as being nervous and disheveled, late for his first meeting with Hitchcock, and prone to talking about his personal psychoanalysis with the great director.

“[Joseph] always dressed elegantly,” Marilyn wrote. “He was not intimidated by Hitch or anyone else, so he wouldn’t have been nervous. And he was eager to talk about the movie, not analysis, and certainly not that he’d been in analysis so long—that might have made Hitch worry that he was too unreliable and unstable to hire.”

“After a scene with Scarlett [Johansson, playing Janet Leigh], she goes into a dressing room to be fitted, and Hitch goes into his office, which evidently is right next to that dressing room, takes down a painting and stares at her through a peephole. In his office?? Since when are the two [rooms] next to each other on a set? Tacky and stupid!"

“They show Hitch first reading the book, with the cover clearly showing the slashed letters, which were designed for the film, so he was reading a book that wasn’t designed yet."

“Though he’s shooting at Universal-Revue [Studios], Barney Balaban (the head of Paramount) comes onto the set demanding to see footage, even though he’s not financing the picture and has no right to even be at the studio."

“I found the picture mean-spirited, with lots of negative things to say about well-known people merely to make people laugh,” Marilyn wrote. “It painted a portrait of this brilliant, one-of-a-kind director/producer as a greedy, malevolent, totally self-centered man who was incapable of showing appreciation and support for anyone….

"Of all the directors Joe worked with, Hitch and Marty Ritt [The Black Orchid] were the very best, the most generous and so self-assured that they liked to have the writer involved…."

Marilyn said that after Hitchcock got to know Joseph and her, he shared his expertise in wine and food with them. Hitchcock also asked if he and Alma could come to a Christmas party they were hosting.

"When they arrived at our house, he planted himself in the bow of the piano that faced the entry door," she wrote. "When people walked through that door, the first person they saw was ALFRED HITCHCOCK!....

“It’s partly out of these fond memories that I’m angry and appalled that they would treat Hitch with so little respect. So I’m speaking up for him—in addition to being upset about their attempts to tarnish my husband’s great contribution to this classic film that still fascinates people.”


Richard Core contributed to this story.

Marilyn Stefano December 25, 2012 at 10:13 pm
You're so right, Paul. And this is a case of Kharma - they got what they deserve! The movie HITCHCOCK isn't even in the top ten money-makers - maybe people are tired of phony history - often the true story is better than the made-up one.
charmaine December 30, 2012 at 12:18 pm
the hatfields and mccoys documentary is not the truth....i have the genealogy.
charmaine December 30, 2012 at 12:23 pm
I havent seen the movie but he did not drive he was paranoid of cops. He told this story himself. He was a marvelous writer and a bit on the odd side with a childhood full of fear and threats. Out of his mouth on a tv show whe i was a kid. I never forgot what he said about why he never drove. A fear of being stopped by the cops.
Gilbert Gauthier December 30, 2012 at 02:55 pm
Are you actually going to the extent of all your concerns and go after a movie that hasn't brought in enough money to pay the Actors..? If you are looking for "Fame" for your deceased hubby... I think 15 people will be the 15 minutes you are seeking. Go to your room.
Norma Remick December 30, 2012 at 03:30 pm
I applaud Mrs. Stafano efforts to correct the mistakes in the film. Hollywood has a nasty habit of rewriting history, even when the real history was much more interesting. Hollywood also seems to think history is uninteresting if it doesn't have romance, glamour and dialogue that was never spoken or situations that could never have happened. The question is "why?" Carry on Mrs. Stafano!!
Norma Remick December 30, 2012 at 03:35 pm
There's a certain amount of truth in what you say but why do Hollywood Execs think what really happened is so dull? If Mr. Stafano wrote the script what makes anyone think they have the right to lessen his contribution to a classic film?
Norma Remick December 30, 2012 at 03:39 pm
There are two sides to every story. That aside, it still does not mean the movie, "Hitchcock" needs to be distorted, ignore the truth or minimize Mr. Stafanos contributions.
Kevin Sorbello December 30, 2012 at 04:16 pm
The danger here, which falls squarely on Hollywood, is that movies become history...they become so imbedded into the cultural consciousness that people end up believing what they see on film, even if the film has disclaimers. Poetic license to fill in the blanks and offer dramatization where facts are missing is ethical; changing history and presenting it as "the way things really were" is unethical, and those in Hollywood that defend such acts should be ashamed of themselves...and perhaps should watch out...because they too might find themselves on the end of the the "all's fair" game...Oh, wait...they already are, and they scream like battered angels when the National Enquirer makes things up. Double standard? The National Enquirer is "entertainment", the same as a "movie", so if you can change history and defame someone in the movie, why not a rag mag like the NE?
Think about it. Now, if you want to make up whimsy, call it such, advertise it as such...but then, who would go see it? Who would go see "this is how Alfred Hitchcock might have been..." I agree with the previous post: there was enough information around to have made a "good" movie, especially with the actors involved, based on what "really" happened...the rest is just unethical rewriting of history.
Michele Beaver December 30, 2012 at 04:55 pm
Who cares? Most everyone likes Hitchcock and his Movies and TV show. So what if there's a few 'mistakes'. Everyone makes them.
Michele Beaver December 30, 2012 at 05:00 pm
AS in alot of those 'docu dramas', they ham it up a bit for the drama, or no one would watch it ! Like those documentaries about the Amish, having such exciting lives, on the farm.
David December 30, 2012 at 07:02 pm
Well.., you don't know if he made an advance at Anthony Perkins or not, do you ? For Anthonys sake I hope he didn't.... yuck !
director101 December 30, 2012 at 07:20 pm
I have been fortunate enough to interview two actresses who worked with Hitch (Tippi Hedren and Shirley MacLaine). Shirley had nothing but praise for him, and Tippi never said that he tried to sleep with her, but that he had her blacklisted when she asked to get out of her contract. It's disappointing that the makers of "Hitchcock" chose to spice things up rather than focus on the true story of what it took to get "Psycho" onto the screen. Kudos to Mrs. Stefano for standing up for the truth.
Eddie Tate December 30, 2012 at 07:49 pm
I'm curious, R.K., how the liberals changed history in Lincoln? Please share...
Cee J December 31, 2012 at 01:11 pm
Hitchcock was one of the greatest director's of all time....what a shame that he is being misrepresented in this current movie...it is all about making money in films today....they put out what they believe will bring in viewers....not facts. I do believe that people who are true to the old movies, directors, etc. will realize this current movie to be the ridiculous, fantastic adaptation of Hitchcock, his wife, and his movies. Some true snipets riddled with sensationalistic inaccuracies. If you want to watch some real real gems of entertainment, with outstanding performances by amazing actors and gifted directors, then watch TCM. Don't bother with the garbage they churn out on the silver screen today.
Colin Bradley December 31, 2012 at 01:53 pm
I don't understand all of these false "biopics" that have fabricated storylines. I remember interviews with actors, actresses, assisitants, and studio writers in a candid biography about Alfred Hitchcock around the time of his 100th birthday (13 years ago??). Joseph Stefano was interviewed; he KNEW everything about the shower scene in "Psycho" and was especially emotional about it, which says he was deeply involved in the film. As for that tripe of 'Tippi' Hedren's, it was another waste of my time. Sure, Sienna Miller had the looks (slightly hardened), she was definitely a better actress than 'Tippi' Hedren. Because 'Tippi' Hedren, like others (Jane Wyman, Julie Andrews, Paul Newman, Roy Thinnes (fired from "Family Plot")), was not Hitchcock's type of actress, please don't make a film that doesn't give the 'real' information. Other stars, for example, Grace Kelly (Princess Grace of Monaco) wanted for the 'icy, cool bonde' "Marnie," (subbed with mediocre 'Tippi' Hedren) praised Alfred Hitchcock for his brilliance; note: she would have been the perfect foil for Diane Baker's dark 'Lil Mainwaring,' which was a jealous homosexual in the book! Why in the world is everyone obsessed with Alfred Hitchcock now! Everyone knows he didn't make these films by himself; Mrs. Stefano is justified in filing suit to CORRECT the information. Remember both Jean Harlow byopics (Carroll Baker and Carol Lynley): false information.
obsidiana December 31, 2012 at 04:03 pm
That is why i am not allowed to watch movies with historical significance with my family. My OCD kicks in and I have to correct what is happening onscreen and it annoys the heck out of them .
obsidiana December 31, 2012 at 04:07 pm
It's all well and good for all of us to site here and say it's just a movie but I think if any of us were in this situation and we saw a member of our family being bastardized onscreen and there was no truth to it the we would be upset to. I think some of it though may be nit picking but in the end she just wants her husband to get the credit he deserves there is nothing wrong with that at all.
MMMMARC December 31, 2012 at 04:29 pm
Carroll Baker is an amazing totally underated actress. Even the giallo film made in Europe with her were excellent and far better than their American counterparts. Carroll Baker is legend!
Marilyn Stefano December 31, 2012 at 06:04 pm
to Obsidiana: Thanks for your understanding.of how protective people can be of their loved ones, especially if they're not here to defend themselves! Makes me wonder how aware the Hitchcock family is about the content of these films - they make him out to be such a monster, & that is not the way he treated my husband, or Kim Novak or Grace Kelly, or Shirley MacLaine, or Doris Day, or... I could go on, but it seems as if Tippi Hedren is the only one complaining about Hitch's behavior. She may well have been under his control, because of their contract, but it sounds like sour grapes because she just was not a good enough actress to have the career she claims he robbed her of But why isn't Hitch's family upset enough to make a statement defending him - Most people who see those 2 movies will believe that he was a lecher, & a monster, & that's not fair.
Lee alderson December 31, 2012 at 09:23 pm
LOL keep on watching and believing fox news and their ilk. again i repeat LOL. idiot
A Male December 31, 2012 at 10:29 pm
As Ms. Stefano's lawsuit reveals, "Hitchcock" is yet another example of the feminazi political machine shamelessly distorting the truth to ascribe to a female a male's achievements. It is affirmative action applied to history. Did a male achieve something great? Well it is only fair that half the credit be given--completely dishonestly--to a female associated with him. And while we're at it let's demonize the male. It's our turn to rule. By whatever means necessary. Alma gives the feminazi's creed: “The people who matter know" the political work that is done by these lies. "That’s all that counts.”
Dallas Mayr January 1, 2013 at 02:56 pm
I'm a novelist and screenwriter, and I write under the name Jack Ketchum. My credentials can be found here -- http://jackketchum.net. I'm responding to the Stefanos' suggestion that it was Joseph Stefano who came up with the idea of killing off his PSYCHO "heroine" in the first reel. This is a blatant lie. In Robert Bloch's novel PSYCHO, Mary Crane (her name was changed to Marion for the film) is killed off on page 37 of a 159-page book, which is roughly a quarter of the way through, not halfway, as the Stefanos contend, and would correspond roughly to the half-hour mark in the film. So it was Bloch's, and not Stefano's innovation. And to say that I rankle at Marilyn Stefano's saying "the script written by my husband was what turned an ugly, trashy little book into a movie watched and studied by every film class in the world," is a massive understatement. That "ugly, trashy little book" has been read by and has influenced virtually every writer working in the areas of suspense and horror in the world today. He is a recognized master at what he did and as such, deserves respect, not slander. Beside his output, Joseph Stefano's is negligable.
Mike H. January 6, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Have to agree the "Hitchcock" creators may have pushed there poetic license a bit to far to make the point that Alma was always an integral part of Alfred's film career. Even the author who wrote the book this movie was based on stated the same story in his book about Hitchcock complementing Stefano by saying Alma liked the early script pages. And let's not forget how close Hitchcock himself worked with his writers throughout his career. There are many books on Hitchcock that document this fact. I will say I did enjoy the "Hitchcock" movie and its story about the making of Pyscho. Enjoyed this article with the various different viewpoints on it. Good luck to you Ms. Stefano.
Egbert Sous January 7, 2013 at 06:35 am
To Dallas Meyr: yessss, the girl is murdered somewhere in the book. So that's Bloch's great contribution in an otherwise mediocre and rather tedious three-penny-thriller. In the book, she's just a mere victim with some story to explain/construct later events. In the movie, she's your leading character, and when she gets killed, you get killed. For a moment, you're lost in this monstruous, surreal world, while watching that boy, you've just known for ten minutes, get rid of the body. Now that's nothing like the book. I have no doubt that Mr. Stefano was largely responsible for the described effect, by applying witty dialogues and believable intrigue. Surely Hitch and Alma had their input and their say, but if they were able to do it all by themselves and have Peggy type it, why bother paying for writers? Especially if they mortgaged their house? Seriously though, every Hitch movie has at least two signatures: Hitch's and the writer's, otherwise we wouldn't know Hecht, Hayes or Hunter. Hitch always insisted on their importance. I didn't expect accuracy from "The Girrrrrl", the setup was simply too stupid. But I'd expect it in "Hitchcock", based on the extremely accurate book from that guy, who co-wrote the Gervasi film. I shall see the movie, but this whole thing has dampened my anxiety. Good luck, Mrs. Stefano.
Steven DeRosa January 8, 2013 at 08:51 pm
Neither Marilyn or Joseph Stefano need me to come to their defense. But some clarification is needed. The "kill her off after thirty minutes” is a misconception created by the makers of "Hitchcock." Sadly, this distorts and misses the entire point of what could arguably be Stefano’s major contribution to "Psycho," which he often stated was the one which got him the job writing for Hitchcock in the first place. As told to Stephen Rebello, myself, and others, Stefano told Hitchcock his approach would be not to start with Norman—as Robert Bloch had done in the novel—but to begin with the girl, immediately setting up the viewer to identify with her as a typical movie protagonist. We follow her, get a sense of her dilemma, root for her, hope she’ll get away with it, or maybe turn around and get out of the situation—then we have the rug pulled out from under us when she’s ripped from the film. The woman Bloch kills off in the first quarter of his novel is not quite the cinematic equivalent of Stefano’s and Hitchcock’s Marion. Hitchcock then wisely and masterfully allowed the audience time to settle down in order to identify with Norman. The moment you find yourself relieved the car has sunk into the swamp, you’re hooked. And that achievement—on the screen—by Mr. Stefano will not be diminished by his dismissal in a movie based loosely on events surrounding Hitchcock or in a comment in response to this article.
— Steven DeRosa, author Writing with Hitchcock
william cook January 9, 2013 at 09:40 pm
Totally agree - without Mr Bloch, there would not have been 'Psycho'. Some might say, myself included, that without Psycho (the book), there would have been no movie and quite possibly a different career ahead of Mr Hitchcock and Stefano.
Ted Newsom January 30, 2013 at 02:45 pm
As a 30-year vet of scribing scripts, articles and lord knows what else, I have to second Mr. (Ms.?) Mayr's comment. I do understand Mrs. Stefano's point, though whether or not JS comes off as badly as all that, I don't know yet. But the story, the beats, the characters and the payoff were all there in Bob Bloch's novel. Having adapted existing material myself, I see Stefano's choices and editorial decisions, and most certainly the dialogue, as wonderful and correct. But the book provided the basis for every one of those choices. And the original book's cover? The PSYCHO letters are indeed split, just like the poster & credits always credited to Saul Bass.
Ted Newsom January 30, 2013 at 02:59 pm
Quite true, it's a good twist-- on an existing framework. If Bob Bloch's "ugly, trashy little book," was such a piece-o'-shit, why buy it in the first place? Why hire him to write episodes of ALFRED HITCHCOCK PRESENTS...? Why would William Castle, Amicus and STAR TREK bother with him? The movie PSYCHO would not exist without Joseph Stefano's script. His script would not exist without RObert Bloch's novel.
As to her other factual objections, sure, it's bllshtt to credit Alma Reville with co-writing the script-- but she was indeed a tremendous influence on all of A.H.'s work. Yes, it's absurd to think A.H.'s office was next to a dressing room, but for goodness' sake... if you WERE going to do that scene, how WOULD you set it up? Follow Hitchcock waddle the quarter-mile from his office to the sound stage, walk through the grips and cables and lights and press his eye up to a hole in Janet Leigh's aluminum dressing room trailer? As Hitchcock always said, "Film is life with the dull parts cut out."
Adelaide Kimball January 30, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Thank you Steven DeRosa, for your clarification of Joe Stefano's approach to the main characters (starting with the girl's story) and the huge impact it made on the story development. I knew and admired Joe professionally and personally, I know and admire Marilyn as well. As an archivist and historian, I am always disappointed and sometimes appalled when movies about true events and people take gratuitous and frivolous liberties with their subjects in the name of entertainment. Sadly, the version that fills the big screen catches our imaginations and eventually becomes the truth to most people thereafter. I am heartened by Marilyn Stefano's stand for ethics and integrity, not just to protect Joe's reputation, but those of the other people involved in Psycho. Bravo to those who are still willing to champion the truth. Adelaide Kimball
Kermit T April 15, 2013 at 01:57 pm
I don't understand those who are saying "it's just a movie". I applaud Mrs. Stefano for defending her husband. I had high expectations for this movie and in truth while watching it I simply came away with the feeling the screenplay was written as a feminist ploy to show how great Alma that it was she who was the real genius instead of Hitchcock. Not a single man in this movie comes off looking good, strong or normal, but all the women come off looking quite wise and strong. correction Hitchcocks agent comes off okay but that might only be as a wink to everyone's agent who stars in the movie.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Agoura Hills Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
CPR/AED & First Aid Training Agoura Hills, CA
Mark Fonseca May 21, 2013 at 11:50 am
Contact Rescue Training Institute at Phone: (818)532-7348 Email: mark@rescuetrainingsocal.com
taylah propst June 7, 2013 at 10:52 am
just before I saw the check saying $5049, I didn't believe ...that...my friend was actually takingRead More home money parttime from their computer.. there mums best friend haz done this less than 12 months and a short time ago repayed the dept on there house and got a brand new Ford Mustang. go to, kep2.com
Local YMCAS offer summer swim classes
taylah propst June 7, 2013 at 10:52 am
If you think Leroy`s story is nice..., a month-ago my mom actually earned $9290 workin twelve hour'sRead More a week from their apartment and the're friend's step-sister`s neighbour has been doing this for nine months and actually earnt more than $9290 parttime on their mac. use the instructions at this address... kep2.com